Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Sep 13, 2012 7:51pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Tape-flips, etc.,

Holy Crap! That is ONE fine piece of technology, eh?

Jeezzz...I could just look at that all day. M, I always recall that my Sony (TCM 5 or some such?) looked better than my Marantz, but Nagra always kicked butt. Looks do sometimes mean something...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: dark.starz Date: Sep 13, 2012 7:58pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Tape-flips, etc.,

Thats because the chassis on the TCD5M was more rigid and slim when compared to the Marantz plastic package. The only fault of the Sony TCD5M was limited bandwidth when compared to the Nak 550 or ultimately a Nagra.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Sep 14, 2012 5:30am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Tape-flips, etc.,

Yup; "TCD5M"...I am sure that was it...